Patients seeking a new ALS treatment can access stem cell therapy in Colombia for $8,000 to $15,000, while Western countries charge $20,000 to $50,000. These cost savings make Colombia one of the most important destinations for cutting-edge medical treatments, especially for those with neurodegenerative disease needs.
Colombian healthcare facilities provide stem cells for ALS treatment at prices 50-70% lower than U.S. and European rates. The quality and expertise remain top-notch. Regencord in Pereira stands out globally as a stem cell therapy center. They deliver outstanding care with proven results. This piece explores how Regencord’s ALS treatment approach combines affordability with world-class medical expertise.
“The premise of stem cell therapy for ALS aims to improve the diseased microenvironment. While stem cells are unable to replace diseased motor neurons directly, transplanted stem cells secrete neurotrophic factors and differentiate into supportive cells, such as astrocytes and microglia, generating a neuroprotective milieu that can slow degeneration of motor neurons.” — Stephen A. Goutman, Director of the Pranger ALS Clinic at the University of Michigan
Scientists are discovering how stem cell research for ALS might slow down disease progression through regenerative medicine. Traditional treatments only manage symptoms, but stem cell therapy targets the root cause of nerve cell degeneration that drives this neurodegenerative disease.
Scientists use several types of stem cells to treat ALS. Each type has unique characteristics:
MSCs lead the pack in ALS treatment research because labs can grow them easily, and they release helpful compounds like transforming growth factor-beta and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Neural progenitor cells (NPCs) also show great promise because they can become supportive glial cells.
Stem cells protect motor neurons instead of replacing damaged ones. These transplanted cells release special proteins called trophic factors that support and protect neurons. One protein, glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF), stands out for its ability to protect motor neurons from breaking down.
These cells also help control the immune system and reduce harmful inflammation in the central nervous system. This matters because inflammation speeds up ALS progression. MSCs also change the environment around motor neurons. They suppress microglial activation and reduce astrogliosis - two key factors in ALS progression.
A recent phase 1/2 clinical trial in 2022 showed that neural progenitors placed in the lumbar spinal cord could become supportive glial cells that produce GDNF. Another analysis from 2023 revealed even more promising results. Patients who received MSC transplants lived an average of 118.8 months—almost 10 years. This was much longer than the expected 70.79 months.
The way doctors deliver stem cells makes a big difference in how well the treatment works. Scientists have developed several approaches:
Intraspinal injection puts cells right where they're needed. Clinical trials show this method can slow disease progression after lumbar procedures. The procedure carries some risks, but studies confirm it's safe when done properly.
Intrathecal administration means injecting cells into the fluid around the spinal cord. This method spreads cells more widely and isn't as invasive as direct spinal injections. Research suggests multiple treatments work better than just one.
Intravenous delivery offers the gentlest approach but faces one big challenge: cells struggle to cross the blood-brain barrier. Still, this method has improved conditions in mice with ALS.
A new technique called subpial delivery shows real promise. Doctors inject cells between the pial membrane and outer spinal cord layers. Animal studies show these cells spread throughout the spinal cord without touching nerve tissues directly. This could make the procedure safer.
Stem cell therapy for ALS looks promising, but we have a long way to go. The FDA hasn't approved any treatments outside clinical trials yet. Scientists keep working to refine these approaches. Their goal? To develop treatments that could change how we fight this challenging neurodegenerative disease.
“Among the 26 patients, 87% were defined as responders to either ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised or forced vital capacity, having at least 25% improvement at six months after treatment in the slope of progression.” — Panayiota Petrou, Senior Neurologist at Hadassah Medical Center
Scientists still ask if stem cells can cure ALS. Clinical trials worldwide give us a clear picture of what these treatments can and cannot do in the quest for an ALS cure.
Early-phase stem cell trials focus mainly on safety checks. Note that several studies confirm stem cell therapy is generally safe for ALS patients.
A groundbreaking study showed that doctors could safely inject bone marrow stem cells into a patient's cerebrospinal fluid with no major side effects. The trial also reported no serious problems in 18 patients who received stem cells engineered to produce GDNF.
Side effects do happen, though. A recent Phase 2 trial found that almost half the patients had moderate to severe reactions. Pain was common - 23 patients reported significant back pain, limb pain, or headache. The good news is most discomfort went away within 1-2 weeks. This led researchers to call the treatment "reasonably well tolerated."
Some trials have shown promising results. One study found that 13 out of 20 patients had better disease progression rates after MSC therapy. Yes, it is worth noting that another trial showed that 6 out of 19 patients lived longer and had slower disease progression during a 9-year follow-up.
ALS stem cell clinical trials use standard ways to measure success. The ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) helps track how well patients can function. Doctors also check breathing ability through forced vital capacity (FVC) tests. Patient survival time tells us the most about treatment success.
The best results come from treatments that slow down the disease. Some patients respond exceptionally well. One recent study found that 21 out of 57 patients had at least 25% slower ALSFRS-R decline after MSC treatment. Another analysis showed patients getting MSC transplants lived an average of 118.8 months—almost 10 years—compared to the expected 70.79 months.
Physical improvements include:
Big challenges still exist. The FDA hasn't approved any stem cell therapy for ALS outside clinical trials. Many studies show treatments work no better than placebos. While some patients get better, others see no change or get worse.
Right now, doctors struggle to predict which patients will respond to treatment. Cellular therapy affects ALS patients differently. Research now focuses on finding biomarkers that might show who will benefit.
Treatment benefits don't always last. Many patients' conditions start getting worse again, suggesting they might need repeated treatments. The risks of intraspinal or intracortical injections must be carefully weighed against possible benefits.
Timing might be the biggest hurdle. Stem cells mainly protect the remaining motor neurons instead of replacing dead ones. One researcher put it simply: "If all the motor neurons are dead, no matter how much progenitor cells and GDNF we deliver, they've got nothing to act on."
The research community stays cautious: stem cell therapy looks promising to slow ALS progression in some patients. However, calling it a "cure" would be premature based on current evidence. The question "Will there be a cure for ALS?" remains open, driving ongoing research efforts.
ALS patients looking beyond standard medicine often search desperately to find treatments that work. The severity of ALS and limited options push them to explore every possible way to manage their condition.
The FDA-approved ALS medications don’t offer much hope. Riluzole adds only 2-3 months to life expectancy. Edaravone works better for patients in the early stages. The latest approved drug, sodium phenylbutyrate/taurursodiol (Relyvrio), helps patients live about 6.5 months longer.
Stem cells for ALS therapies take a different approach than standard treatments that focus on symptoms. These therapies target the disease mechanisms that cause the condition through multiple pathways.
Stem cell treatments vary substantially across countries. CORESTEM in South Korea became the first company to license an ALS stem cell therapy using autologous mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). Chinese medical centers have treated over 500 patients with olfactory ensheathing cell transplants. About 42 of these patients showed better ALS functional scores after multiple treatments.
Medical centers in Western countries focus on MSCs, neural progenitors, and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). Doctors can deliver these cells through intrathecal (into spinal fluid), intraspinal, or intravenous methods. Each approach comes with its own risks and benefits.
Research shows ALS patients try alternative treatments with specific hopes:
A German survey found that 54% of ALS patients used complementary or alternative medicine. Up to 63% kept using these treatments even when they saw no clear benefits.
Many patients don't tell their doctors about using alternative treatments. They worry about being judged or losing access to standard care. This breakdown in communication makes it harder to provide complete care and shows how desperate patients feel when faced with this terminal illness that has so few standard treatment options.
Regencord has developed specialized protocols that distinguish their approach from mainstream ALS treatments. Their methods align with state-of-the-art developments in regenerative medicine research, showing promise for this challenging condition.
Regencord’s approach focuses on neural progenitors engineered to express glial cell-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) – a powerful growth factor that protects neurons from degeneration. The specialized stem cells are implanted directly into the lumbar spinal cord through precise ALS surgery. This targeted delivery will give the therapeutic cells direct access to the area controlling leg movement, which maximizes benefits.
Regencord's patient eligibility follows strict guidelines to optimize outcomes. Qualified candidates are 18 to 80 years old with an ALS diagnosis received within the previous 24 months. The functional capacity assessment needs an upright slow vital capacity (SVC) of at least 60% of the predicted value based on age, height, sex, and ethnic group.
Regencord works with patients' existing medication regimens. Patients can continue taking riluzole if they've used it for at least 30 days before treatment. Their approach balances selective criteria with inclusivity to support various disease presentations.
Follow-up monitoring is the lifeblood of Regencord's protocol. Patients undergo quarterly clinical evaluations where they complete standardized activity tasks while wearing advanced sensors. These appointments use the ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) - a proven assessment tool that measures physical function in daily activities.
Patients wear hip-mounted accelerometers for 3-7 days between visits to track subtle movement changes. This detailed monitoring provides valuable data on treatment effectiveness, as accelerometer measurements strongly correlate with survival outcomes. The technology-enhanced monitoring among standard evaluations helps Regencord refine its protocols for the best patient care.
Patients who want stem cell transplants for ALS at Regencord start a well-laid-out trip that aims to get the best results. Their detailed pathway has evaluation, individual-specific treatment, and continuous care.
Treatment begins with a detailed consultation where medical specialists review each patient’s condition. Doctors look at existing medical reports and previous studies to see how stem cell therapy might help. The health administration team gets a full picture of the patient’s current health status to check if they qualify. Specialists use this information to create a treatment plan that fits the specific needs of the ALS patient.
The procedure on treatment day runs efficiently:
Most procedures at Regencord happen on an outpatient basis. Patients can go back to their rooms the same day. More than 90% of patients say they see positive results. The facility's strict safety benchmarks mean zero serious problems have occurred.
After treatment, patients join a detailed follow-up program that tracks progress and improves results. They meet regularly with specialists who monitor how well the treatment works and how the disease changes. The clinic's medical team stays available 24/7, so patients can get expert help whenever they need it.
Most patients start feeling better 2-3 months after their first treatment. Long-term research looks promising. The largest longitudinal study shows that patients who got stem cells lived 46.6 months—5.5 months longer than similar patients who didn't get the treatment.
Stem cell therapy offers ALS patients new hope for treatment, but it works best when combined with other care approaches instead of being used alone. Research shows promising results that slow down the disease’s progression. Success depends on choosing the right patients and setting realistic goals.
The protocol at Regencord’s facility in Pereira delivers excellent results. They combine cutting-edge cell therapy with close patient monitoring and complete support systems. ALS patients find this facility attractive because of their proven track record and lower costs than Western clinics.
ALS treatment’s future will likely combine different therapies, and stem cell treatment will play a bigger role. We have a long way to go, but we can build on this progress as researchers keep improving treatment methods to help patients battle this tough neurodegenerative disease. Schedule a consultation with Regencord and experience the difference!
3-Step Process for Stem Cell Treatment for Arthritis in Hands
Stem cells are unique cells with the ability to develop into various cell types and repair damaged tissues. They are used in regenerative medicine, including treatments for cancer, neurodegenerative diseases, and injuries. Sources include bone marrow, cord blood, and embryos.
(888) 540-4101
Begin your journey with us today! Call us at (888) 540-4101 or complete the form to learn more.